Lesson 3.2.1.3.3

3.2.1.3.3 Piliavin's subway study Quiz: AQA Psychology, Unit 5

20 questions

In partnership with Revision Ninja

Lesson 3.2.1.3.3, Piliavin's subway study: 20 multiple choice questions for the AQA GCSE Psychology (8182), Unit 5: Social influence, written with Revision Ninja.

Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.

Host this setFree Play

The 20 questions

  1. In which city was Piliavin's subway field experiment conducted?

    • London
    • Chicago
    • New York City
    • Paris
  2. What staged event was used to measure helping behaviour in Piliavin's subway study?

    • A stolen handbag
    • A dropped shopping bag
    • A confederate collapsing
    • A medical emergency call
  3. What were the two victim conditions tested in Piliavin's subway study?

    • Child and elderly
    • Drunk and cane
    • Rich and poor
    • Blind and deaf
  4. How did passenger response to the cane victim compare to the drunk victim in Piliavin's study?

    • Reported to staff
    • Ignored more often
    • Helped much faster
    • Helped much slower
  5. Who were the participants being observed in Piliavin's subway study?

    • Undercover police officers
    • Subway train guards
    • Ordinary subway passengers
    • Psychology students
  6. What key concept did Piliavin use to explain passenger responses to victims?

    • Agency theory
    • Social identity theory
    • Cost-reward matrix
    • Levels of processing
  7. Why did the drunk victim receive less help in Piliavin's field experiment?

    • Lack of visibility
    • Too far away
    • Higher perceived cost
    • Lower social status
  8. Which factor did Piliavin's study focus on in relation to helping?

    • Similarity to victim
    • Diffusion of responsibility
    • Group size
    • Cost of helping
  9. Why was help given quickly to the victim with a cane in Piliavin's study?

    • Direct staff orders
    • Mandatory train rules
    • Higher personal reward
    • Lower perceived cost
  10. Which ethical guideline was inevitably breached in Piliavin's subway study?

    • Informed consent
    • Protection from harm
    • Right to withdraw
    • Debriefing sessions
  11. What was the main methodological advantage of conducting Piliavin's study on a subway?

    • No ethical issues
    • High ecological validity
    • Strict control
    • Standardised conditions
  12. What key methodological strength did Piliavin's subway study demonstrate?

    • High ecological validity
    • Zero demand characteristics
    • Complete participant consent
    • Full variable control
  13. Where was Piliavin's subway field experiment conducted?

    • Chicago Subway
    • New York City
    • Paris Metro
    • London Underground
  14. Which key situational variable did Piliavin's subway study examine?

    • Victim condition
    • Room temperature
    • Time of day
    • Group size
  15. When was Piliavin's subway study published?

    • 1969
    • 1951
    • 1963
    • 1975
  16. According to Piliavin's subway study, helping behaviour is heavily influenced by what factor?

    • Time of day
    • Victim appearance
    • Group size
    • Weather conditions
  17. In Piliavin's study, helping a person with a cane is primarily driven by what?

    • Perceived need
    • Deindividuation
    • Social loafing
    • Diffusion of responsibility
  18. Why was less help given to the drunk victim in Piliavin's study?

    • Perceived risk
    • Sensory overload
    • Racial prejudice
    • Moral fatigue
  19. What term describes the victim condition in which the victim appeared to be intoxicated?

    • Matched condition
    • Cane condition
    • Drunk condition
    • Control condition
  20. What key factor did Piliavin's subway study show affects helping behaviour in real settings?

    • Victim appearance
    • Background noise
    • Weather conditions
    • Experimenter gender

All AQA Psychology quizzes