Lesson 6.3.1
6.3.1 Loftus and Palmer, Bradbury and Williams, Valentine and Mesout, and Howells studies Quiz: Pearson Edexcel Psychology, Unit 6
20 questions
In partnership with Revision Ninja
Lesson 6.3.1, Loftus and Palmer, Bradbury and Williams, Valentine and Mesout, and Howells studies: 20 multiple choice questions for the Pearson Edexcel Psychology (9PS0), Unit 6: Criminological psychology, written with Revision Ninja.
Host it live on the board and students join with a game code on their own devices, or revise alone with Free Play. The answers are revealed in the game.
The 20 questions
-
What did Loftus and Palmer (1974) investigate in their study on eyewitness testimony?
- Jury decision making
- Leading questions
- Weapon focus
- Participant stress
-
What independent variable was manipulated in Experiment 1 of Loftus and Palmer (1974)?
- Participant age group
- Car collision speed
- Question verb used
- Video clip duration
-
In Loftus and Palmer (1974), which verb produced the highest mean speed estimate?
- Hit
- Smashed
- Contacted
- Bumped
-
What phenomenon were Loftus and Palmer demonstrating when participants incorrectly recalled seeing broken glass?
- Retroactive interference
- Repression
- Proactive interference
- False memories
-
What main memory process did Loftus and Palmer's (1974) study demonstrate?
- Displacement
- Retroactive interference
- Repression
- Reconstructive memory
-
How did Valentine and Mesout (2009) measure physiological arousal in the London Dungeon study?
- Heart rate
- Blood pressure
- Skin conductance
- Cortisol levels
-
Which type of validity is reduced by using video clips in Loftus and Palmer's study?
- Face validity
- Construct validity
- Ecological validity
- Internal validity
-
In Loftus and Palmer (1974), what type of information altered eyewitness memory estimates?
- Post-event information
- Pre-event expectations
- Subliminal perception
- Sensory deprivation
-
What type of phrasing was used in Loftus and Palmer's question to alter memory?
- Structured interrogation
- Open question
- Leading question
- Closed categorical question
-
What primary factor's effect on juror decision-making was investigated by Bradbury and Williams (2013)?
- Educational background
- Offender age
- Socioeconomic status
- Defendant race
-
Which methodological feature is most critical to evaluate in Bradbury and Williams' mock-jury study?
- Ecological validity
- Internal consistency
- Test-retest stability
- Inter-rater reliability
-
What is the main methodological strength of Valentine and Mesout's (2009) London Dungeon study?
- Zero participant demand
- High internal control
- Easy variable manipulation
- High ecological validity
-
What primary ethical concern arose from inducing anxiety in Valentine and Mesout's (2009) study?
- Right to payment
- Right to publish
- Breach of copyright
- Protection from harm
-
What did Howells et al. (2005) evaluate regarding brief anger management programmes for offenders?
- Predictors of change
- Dietary intervention effects
- Genetics of aggression
- Hormonal imbalance levels
-
Why is identifying predictors of change useful in offender anger management programmes?
- Replaces judicial trials
- Reduces prison sentences
- Guarantees total cure
- Targets suitable offenders
-
What methodological limitation prevents establishing clear cause-and-effect in offender outcome studies?
- Demand characteristics
- Observer drift
- Sampling bias
- Extraneous variables
-
Which contemporary study in criminological psychology is a field study on eyewitness identification under stress?
- Bowlby (1944)
- Valentine and Mesout (2009)
- Loftus and Palmer (1974)
- Rosenhan (1973)
-
Why might mock-juror decisions differ from actual trial verdicts in court?
- No real consequences
- Extended deliberation time
- Biased judge instructions
- Excessive prison pressure
-
What main limitation arises from using student-only samples in eyewitness research?
- Poor task repeatability
- High observer bias
- Low population validity
- Low internal validity
-
What was the main advantage of using standardised video clips in Loftus and Palmer (1974)?
- Increased emotional arousal
- Naturalistic participant responses
- High ecological validity
- High experimental control
Related quizzes
- Biological and social explanations of crime Quiz · 6.1.1 · 20 questions
- Understanding offenders: cognitive and ethical interviews and formulation Quiz · 6.1.2 · 20 questions
- Treatments for offenders: CBT and biological treatment Quiz · 6.1.3 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting eyewitness testimony Quiz · 6.1.4 · 20 questions
- Factors affecting jury decision-making Quiz · 6.1.5 · 20 questions
- Individual and developmental differences in criminal behaviour Quiz · 6.1.6 · 20 questions
- Eyewitness research methods, sampling and ethics Quiz · 6.2.1 · 20 questions
- Data analysis, reliability and validity in criminological research Quiz · 6.2.2 · 20 questions
- Key question: eyewitness testimony and jury bias Quiz · 6.4.1 · 20 questions
- Issues and debates in criminological psychology Quiz · 6.6.1 · 20 questions